RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Aspiration pneumonia (AP) is a subset of pneumonia caused by the aspiration of food and fluids to the lungs and is highly prevalent in the older population. Oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD) is one of the risk factors for AP and it is also associated with malnutrition, dehydration and poor functional outcomes. As pneumonia is the second most common infection in nursing homes (NHs) and OD represents a major concern to NH staff, good practices for the prevention of AP in older adults at risk of OD are needed. PURPOSE: The aim of this modified e-Delphi study is to build consensus among a panel of experts regarding a set of recommendations for NH staff on good practices to prevent AP in older adults at risk of OD living in NHs. The objective of this paper is to establish the methodology inherent to the Delphi study. METHODS: An online modified Delphi study will be developed in three rounds. Criteria for the Delphi panel participants include holding a master's or doctoral degree in OD or speech and language therapy; or having 10 or more years of experience in OD; or having at least one scientific publication related to OD. A previously described modified Delphi methodology will be used to achieve consensus (75% agreement). An additional round will be performed to collect the experts' perspectives regarding the priority for application of each recommendation previously validated. DISCUSSION: This protocol aimed to describe the methodology of a future Delphi study on the prevention of AP, seeking to fulfil the gap in the literature regarding this topic. The modified Delphi technique is a widely used method for collecting experts' opinion in health sciences, but the absence of standardised guidelines allows some heterogeneity between studies with the same aim. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: What is already known on the subject Aspiration pneumonia (AP) is related to three main risk factors: impaired safety of swallow, impaired nutritional status and poor oral health. It is known that being dependent for feeding is one of the main risk factors for AP and around 50% of nursing home (NH) residents need feeding assistance. Thus, it is important to promote specialised intervention and care by the NH staff for preventing AP. What this paper adds to existing knowledge It is hypothesised that increasing the knowledge of NH staff regarding the best practices for preventing AP in older adults at risk of oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD) will improve outcomes such as quality of life, incidence of AP and mortality. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? The recommendations resulting from this study will address a current gap in healthcare practice of NH staff regarding older adults at increased risk for OD and, consequently, for AP.
RESUMO
Purpose The aim of the study was to provide an updated systematic review of randomized controlled trials that studied the effectiveness of pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions to prevent aspiration pneumonia in older adults at risk for aspiration. Method The search was conducted in MEDLINE (PubMed), Scopus, and Web of Science databases and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, using a protocol registered on PROSPERO (CRD42019139973). Randomized controlled trials of interventions to reduce the incidence of aspiration pneumonia in individuals older than 65 years at risk for aspiration, published between January 2002 and July 2019 and written in English, were included. Two reviewers independently evaluated the methodological quality of studies using the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Results Thirteen out of 703 articles identified met the eligibility criteria and were included. Six studies focused on pharmacological interventions, three studies focused on dietary interventions and compensatory strategies, one study focused on oral care, two studies focused on multidisciplinary interventions, and one study assessed a screening method. Four studies showed positive and statistically significant effect in reducing aspiration pneumonia but were considered to have unclear or high risk of bias. Three studies showed promising results on the preventive effect of pharmacological interventions. Conclusions The most recent evidence on the prevention of aspiration pneumonia in older adults revealed modest to poor methodological quality. Given the burden of aspiration pneumonia on patients and on the health care systems, the development of larger well-designed trials on this topic is of undoubted importance.
